The Passionate Attachment

America's entanglement with Israel

Norway Massacre: Cui Bono?

with 4 comments

In his latest piece, Justin Raimondo raises some interesting questions about whether Anders Breivik acted alone:

Who benefits from a wave of anti-Muslim hysteria and terrorism carried out by previously unknown groups such as Breivik’s “Knights Templar Europe”? This is the first but not the last question one has to ask, and other questions naturally follow, such as: how did Breivik manage to finance his terrorist operation, which was begun, full-time, starting in at least 2009? Aside from his own boasting about having started several successful companies, we don’t really know how Breivik made a living through all the years of preparation for his day of terror, except what’s on the public record: his Facebook page, and official records, some of which are coming to light. We know he is the sole director of Breivik Geofarm, a business with 790 employees engaged in growing vegetables. I see no evidence of his having seriously worked for a living, although he did get a degree in management. But what was he managing – and who were the investors? There are also rumors he gave a lot of money to the counter-jihadist movement. Where did it come from?

Although Raimondo names David Horowitz, Pamela Geller and Melanie Phillips as having inspired Breivik’s Islamophobia, he somehow manages to overlook their “passionate attachment” to Israel — preferring instead to label them “neocons.” At least one reader who commented on the piece seems to have a clearer understanding of who benefits from the massacre in Oslo, however:

Neocons? – how about calling them by their real names – ZIONISTS!


Written by Maidhc Ó Cathail

July 27, 2011 at 3:44 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. No worries, you can call things by their proper names. Luckily Rita Katz improved her operational area and probably tracking Adolf Gaudahn so he won’t be able to hurt you.
    SITE Monitoring Service: White Supremacist Threat


    July 27, 2011 at 4:30 pm

  2. I’m still not wholly convinced as to why Mossad didn’t just use Muslim patsies like 9/11 and 7/7 etc…Zionists would have benefited far more from Muslim patsies being framed/manipulated into doing this, rather than ‘white supremacists’ with Zionist leanings.


    July 27, 2011 at 4:46 pm

  3. Probably because it wasn’t easy to maintain the “Clash” narrative when you had only side. Breivik now embodies the “Zionist-Crusader alliance” that Adam Gadahn has been urging Muslims to wage jihad against.

    Maidhc Ó Cathail

    July 27, 2011 at 4:58 pm

  4. Rita must have some pretty good intelligence sources!

    Maidhc Ó Cathail

    July 27, 2011 at 5:01 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: