The Passionate Attachment

America's entanglement with Israel

How the Arab Spring pushed Russia into Israel’s lap

with one comment

By Maidhc Ó Cathail
The Passionate Attachment
June 27, 2012

In a June 15 Insight for the Institute for Israeli National Security Studies (INSS) entitled “Russian Policies in an Era of Change,” Zvi Magen observes in relation to President Putin’s visit to Israel:

Russia’s standing in the region was undermined by the Arab Spring, when it lost most of the strongholds it had worked hard and long to construct. Now Russia is finding itself challenged by Islam’s rising power and is feeling isolated in the Arab world.

Magen, a former Israeli ambassador to Moscow, goes on to suggest:

In this new reality, it seems that some part of Russia’s interests is also in changing its Middle East policy; the echoes of this discussion on the intra-Russian scene are loaded. Some of the questions on the agenda are the need for an alternative to the radical axis with Russian involvement in the Middle East, which is crumbling before its eyes, as well as the establishment of new levers of influence in this critical area to replace those that have been lost.

Looking at how Israel fits into these developments, the former ambassador claims:

It seems that, in this new reality, Moscow senses that Russia and Israel are in the same boat, allowing the former to view the latter as a desirable partner in the region.

Writing in a June 24 op-ed in The Moscow Times, Andrei Kozhinov, director for Russian affairs at the Jerusalem-based rightwing Israel Project, strikes a similar note:

The Arab Spring is not perceived as a positive regional development because it has led to the rise of radical Islam. The Kremlin’s fear is that there may be a spillover effect in the North Caucasus and Central Asia.

President Vladimir Putin’s visit to Israel on Monday might be part of a new Kremlin policy toward Jerusalem. Israel is seen as a prosperous and stable regional power whose interests often coincide with Moscow’s. For example, Israel and Russia have strained relations with Turkey, and both fear the turbulence of radical Islam. Economically, trade between the two countries is growing, as is military and homeland-­security cooperation.

Citing Kozhinov’s piece, influential foreign policy commentator Walter Russell Mead adds:

The shared interests of the two countries cover some important ground: they oppose Turkey’s ambition to become a regional hegemon, they distrust the Obama administration’s support of democracy even when that leads to Islamist regimes and they both fear the rise of Sunni Islamism as a dangerous and destabilizing force.

Mead, known to be sympathetic to Israel, also observes:

Putin will find this a refreshing conversation; unlike American diplomats and their talk of universal principles and global order, it’s likely that the Israelis will speak the language of national interests that Putin prefers.

Commenting on Mead’s piece, Zack Beauchamp, writing in the rightwing pro-Israel Tablet Magazine, implies in a somewhat threatening tone that this should make the U.S. think twice before putting any pressure on Tel Aviv:

The unstated implication is that Bibi will find a conversation free of human rights discourse equally refreshing. What this suggests is that Washington’s ability to pressure Israel is directly dependent on the degree to which Israel relies on American financial and political support. Cut Israel off completely and it’ll find new friends, perhaps ones less interested in nudging Israel towards a deal with its Arab neighbors. It’s true that those new friends might not support Israel as fully as the U.S. does, but it’s not clear that this discrepancy would be enough to force Israel to accede to American terms.

In light of these overlapping analyses, it would appear that the Arab Spring has induced Russia to consider a closer relationship with Israel, which would afford Tel Aviv even greater leverage in its “special relationship” with the United States. Despite the much-touted Israeli fears of the winds of change blowing across the region, it appears to have been an ill wind…

Advertisements

Written by Maidhc Ó Cathail

June 26, 2012 at 4:08 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Anyone who is familiar with the history of Zionism – knows that most of leaders of World Zionist movement were communist and socialist atheists. They wanted to established a western socialist state in the occupied Palestine. Even Israel’s first president Dr. Chaim Weizman was former leader of Russian Socialist Party. However, the Russian problem was how to fund the new Zionist empire. The United States not only beat Russia in recognizing Israel by a few hours but also promised to fund the Zionist project.

    Furthermore, Zionists and Russian have common bond against Muslims. Both are colonial powers occupying Muslim lands. Russia has already betrayed Iran by refusing to make delivery of S-300 anti-missile defense system to protec Iranians against US-Israel attacks.

    There is an old Persian wisdom which warns that “a friend of your enemy cannot be friend of yours”. Putin’s current visit to Israel has proved that.

    http://rehmat1.com/2011/08/17/tehran-should-not-trust-moscow/

    rehmat1

    June 26, 2012 at 7:39 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: